About this Site
Create your own website today!
Update your website
Vote for this Site
Visit My Chat Room
Popular Popups
Jukebox
Message Board
Classified Ads
Statistics
Refer This Site
To A Friend

Campaign
Twenty Zeros
Individual Survey




United Debates Of America
Open Presidential Debate Randy Frushour First Decade 20 Os 21st Century Publishing Campaign Party System Institutionalization Project Right Media Coverage Reform Way Of Their Future UN Referendum No Child Under 16


  NEW! Poetry and Doll Maker with Galleries!     [Learn About Our Ecommerce]
Graphics Gallery!

PROJECT FUTUREWAY -
The way to the future: Stop the nonsense, protect the children and their children. Become a project sponsor. We need to keep to keep our freedom of speech, freedom to Vote on the passing of what the government has "say." They can change for their advancement without our consent. This is their way of getting started to change anything they wish. Let's vote our way. There are more people than Senators, Congressman, lawmakers, politicians and representatives. We have say! We have the power. We can rule.

Sign the petition. Let's help - everyone! We can make a difference. Sign Up

100 WORD MANIFESTO MARCH 2006 above lines - Connie Martin




MoveOn Censure President Bush Petition - Connie Says'
"As an American I would like to see more of governmental censure being taken care of. More so we need to work on not letting our government change the law such as the Patriot Act. If we let important issue go by us. Then next it will be a much bigger protest."


Global Warming Debate Streaming Video

The Debate Over Wind Energy Video



CNBC On Wind Energy



Multiparty Proportional Representation


Debate This - Sign Up Petition To Open US Presidential Debates To More Candidates


Great Job
Jeff Smith Director GRIID Grand Rapids Institute For Information Democracy Primary Election Coverage Study Finds TV News Still Falls Short on Informing the Public.
For the 3rd year in a row now the GR Institute for Information Democracy (GRIID) has completed a 30-day study of local TV news election coverage. The following are the major findings of the study:
All 3 TV stations failed to provide adequate information to viewers that would allow them to make an informed vote.
Of the combined 45 minutes and 29 seconds of air time devoted to the primary elections, only 2 minutes and 21 seconds had candidates speaking, and 56 seconds of that total was about issues.
For every election story given by the 3 stations combined there were 8.3 crime stories.
Fox 17 had as many stories in the 30-day period on a Jerry Springer contestant accused of murder (5) as they did election stories (5).
Channel 13 had more stories on the Mackinac Island power outage (8) than they did on the election (7).
Channel 8 had almost as many stories about a shooting outside a Walker Street Party store (9) as they did about the elections (11).
Of the 5 Kent County Commission races only 1 received any coverage - the Turner/Mayhue race.
Comparatively, the Grand Rapids Press gave more stories about the elections (33) than all three stations combined (23).
The election story with the highest combined air-time was the Hudsonville Alcohol ballot proposals - 9 minutes and 57 seconds.

Born To Run? Candidates For U S Multiparty Democracy Cast in Order Of Appearance
Come On Line Up For The Rising. - Bruce we need you now for the rising - A Friend.

Building A Multiparty Democracy In America

Presidential Campaign and Candidates Cast In Order Of Appearance
Natural Law
Green Party


Multiparty Democracy Needed Now

Moving Beyond Plutocracy To American Democracy In The Twenty Zeros

Diane Cardwell Writer For The NY Times Comment's On Professor Doug Muzzio of School Of Public Affairs at Baruch College (who says) - Chief policy-program goal seems to be the creation of a multiparty system or at least creating the conditions for the emergence of such a system and that "the system influenced not only the type of political parties that exist but also the type of candidates voters have to choose from" and went in the article on to say "ultimately, they determine the political stability and the legitimacy of the system itself.". Read her entire article and commentaries NY Times.Com Or email page publisher.

Opened Debates

INTRODUCTION - CHALLENGING THE TWO-PARTY SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT
On average, 60 percent of Americans tell pollsters that they are in favor of third party alternatives. Republicans and Democrats have been able to maintain their dominance and no third party has representation in the U.S. Congress or is in contention for control of any state legislature. John Bibby and Sandy Maisel explained that the two-party system has come as a surprise to observers of American society:
That the United States should have the oldest and strongest two-party system on the globe is for many, particularly for foreign observers, a bewildering phenomenon. America appears to have all the ingredients for a vibrant and enduring multiparty system--an increasingly multiracial and multi-ethnic population, substantial regional variation, diverse and conflicting economic and social interests, a history of sectional conflicts, and substantial disparities in the distribution of wealth.

Open and Inclusive Debates
Public debates afford voters an opportunity to learn about their candidates in ways that campaign literature, television ads, radio commercials, and the internet do not. The pseudo-governmental bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates should be abolished in its current in favor of a non-partisan body that sets equitable criteria for the inclusion of candidates at the presidential level. Local non-partisan bodies should also serve to facilitate debates.


Opinion of Americas national political body are mainly that only politicians are able to "stand stately" as elected, or appointed in national office such as in White House occupancy are false and now a wrong standard for social acceptance aren't these or so am I wrong? Although this writer is not insistent about the statement, it is rather true that many, many Americans are qualified for places in governing and public service whom are not politicians AND too others whom in entertainment are of serious talents for national leadership.

Page campaigns individual political persuasion is clearly and precisely, "let whomever wins" the majority of votes declare them self winner though with this contingency "that only however after open media aired debates" as under presumption that presidential sanctioned debates, featuring well financed parties and their candidates are predetermined as public announcement, and do consist here of three 3 (three) or more participants. This would be the minimal appearing of our democratic elections platform in as such, our free enterprise and capitalist world diplomacy. Less than 3 candidates equally covered in media is nothing less than "majoritarian closed government rule" and an oligarchy, brewing next full blown "authoritarian anarchy" domination as we've seen the 2000 elections fail to work all along the process.
Since barring the third Party candidates officially (9.13.2000 - Nader/Buchannan) from public debates for whatever no good reason, you (we) have "no fair options" in our vote booth. You have to (must) choose one or the other "main parties" and leadership labels that a choice. Be a smart voting citizen. Say NO to 1x2-party anarchical totalitarianism where control is absolute. USGP
"The political discussion needs sort of a leggo set of descriptive and argumentative elements, so that situations, questions and proposals may be readily expressed" - John Tinker.
Multiparty brief compilation sponsored by the United Debates Of America include intends adopted resolution for nonpartisan reforms throughout the Zeros decade in resumes of the 2002 through 2010 national legislatings and proceedings of an elections framework act of multiparty procedures of democracy, under our U.S. Constitution or emerging as Amendment agenda of proceedings venued through the Congress of the United States. Memod 03.12.2002 USGP

Issues and Party Competition Under Alternative Electoral Systems

Jeffrey A. Karp and Susan A. Banducci University of Waikato, New Zealand

Proximity and directional spatial models yield different predictions for mass-elite linkages under alternative
electoral systems. Whereas the proximity or Downsian model predicts that parties are likely to adopt positions
that are closer to their voters, the alternative directional model predicts parties will adopt more extreme positions
in order to generate political support among an electorate that has diffuse policy interests (Macdonald and
Rabinowitz, 1989; Macdonald et al., 1991; Rabinowitz et al., 1991). Theoretical arguments lead us to expect that the
directional model is most applicable in plurality systems, while the proximity model is best for describing party
and voter behaviour in multiparty systems. While others have examined these models from a cross-national
perspective, we employ an alternative research design using candidate and mass opinion data from New Zealand,
where voters have experienced a change in the electoral system.

TipJar tip jar Smart Tip Inside!



EDITORIAL DRAFT DOCUMENT UNITED STATES PUBLISHER
International Consortium and Colloquium

My planning document is preparred for organizers in a multiparty democracy system as reinstated polygonal and presently a working campaign in the United States that is fast moving toward geo-political economic cooperation for anyones use in sharing and formating their own word documents, as "proposed legislation" on same topics declaring "public rights and freedoms." I'm NOT entering politics nor am I running for office nor, lawyer or an elite though do have great or some "publication credibility or recognition" as managing and editing Producers of more than "ephemeral print document appearance." I began net publishing with, and will finish if possible "voicing platforms for regular or common people - so a Voice For Future
Generations
." The need for a multiparty polygonal electorate college is not incompatible nor inconsistent with the need for greater awareness of global rising of "secret government," legal anarchy and some terrorism. It is my concern in and for this word proposal to see a "central document" emerge as co-initiators of "campaign reform" move ahead for an Equal Campaign Rights Amendment and with some consideration of the highlights of this page and with discussions of the independent movement.
Now in 1993 voters in New Zealand approved a referendum changing its electoral system from
a plurality or "first past the post" (FPP) to proportinal representation (PR). The adoption or PR
represents a radical change from majoritarian to a consensus democracy. There are no current
empirical studies on how "change in the electoral system" has altered the relationship between
elites and voters... UNLESS Comparative Politics Studies Of - The Size Of Government In Majoritarian And Consensus Democracies


Party Institutionalization In New Democracies

Vicky Randall University of Essex and Lars Svåsand University of Bergen

The literature on democratization emphasizes the contribution of political parties, and in that context the
importance of party institutionalization. But this concept remains relatively unexplored. Our article first considers
the relationship between party institutionalization and party system institutionalization, pointing out that they are
not necessarily convergent. We then review the existing literature on party institutionalization, indicating
weaknesses and contradictions, before offering our own analytic model. In the final section we identify some of
the key considerations arising when this model is applied to the particular circumstances of democratic transition
in the Third World.


We could systematically institutionalize "five nominations" before further on and next (media) closed elections
Please note that when 3 contending candicacies rise before the electoral count, there would require "only but" 181 electoral votes "to clinch" in the near tie and if when with 4 contenders in a close race splitting up the votes "136 would win out over the other 3 receiving 135 electoral votes." The Elections 2000 Dillema though distances itself and does diminish when 3 or more contenders battle out in the electoral college. It should and must follow then that when more than 2 candidates are nearing a tie the one with the most electoral votes simply wins a decision as does in a close 2-candidate race.

Frushour Twenty Zeros Report - With MANY NEW organizations based in our soil and too internationally so represented the question is asked "Why Fewer Choices To select From?"
Proposed Law for Senate Commissioning as committed to oblige public campaigns and candidates of strong party contention, to recommend in their each address to voters as a first campaign order and party agenda, "the new E.C.R.C. (Equal Campaign Reform Coalition) retroactive, in escalation of their platforms to favorable public conditions with News Media, which with their purposed platform for President and Vice-President election overtones their sought for political outcome(s) of and by a "4-year by 4-year" campaign, as their personal career choosing and presented us by public announcement and under resolution authorized 21st century transnational democracy law (purvued with United Nations statistically proceeding) and as our statute by legislation, to "law and major enacting of ECRC."
The above proposal goes beyond legal theory to realm of probability because where democracy as we once knew may now only be possible as put forth in a "campaign media reform bill" for 3rd and peripheral party debate agenda, in "this of concepts widely, my multiparty reality" there so is proportional consensus for national election speaking venues.

An "Equal Campaign Rights Amendment" Would Be An Campaign Media Reform Coalition of any and all media reporting in the U.S. with exclusions to World Wide Web secured participant applications of electronic media and/or "further out and over there with any legal provisions of content," should as must record minutely to the Commission On Ethics and Violations (two distinct matters)
"equal accurate air-timed minutes" of each Candidates news or ad coverage or be in violation and subject to judicial investigations in accordance with federal or state laws or both.


Speeches Protest Demonstration Platforms

Contact Your Senator

How Transnational Factors Influence the Success OF Ethnic, Religious and Regional Parties in 21 States

Livianna S. Tossutti University of Calgary, Canada

This article explores whether ethnic, religious and regional parties in 21 advanced capitalist democracies are more
likely to achieve political salience in systems which have been more exposed to the effects of globalization and
post-industrialization. Globalist-localist scholars have argued that the new localism - which encompasses the
post-war resurgence of decentralist political movements - is linked to intensified international interdependence
and changes in production and consumption modes. Using quasi-likelihood statistical methods, we find that
parties catering to particularist interests are more likely to participate in ruling coalitions to support minority
governments, or to serve as the official opposition in countries that have been relatively insulated from
transnational forces. While domestic economic conditions and a party's lifespan and programmatic orientation
also influence the probability for success, domestic institutional arrangements such as electoral systems and the
division of powers do not.

This is a Twenty Zeros special internet report. I'm Randy Frushour. The new Year, Decade, Century and Millennium an unparalleled era with significant "beginnings and statehood" and in particulars with unprecedented "U.S. political party moves" is which cradle activities of our present campaign reform motioning.

A WORD FROM THE PUBLISHER 2-27-2001
Expanded word documents will be published in the proceeding months as for " implementing needed change" for elections "backup support" and also as a safety net while set in place here for legislating this date, as the "U S Multiparty Democratic Campaign" in concert with the "Independent Appeal", a partnered vertical proposition document purview for Presidential campaigns, debates and elections reform at present is yet minor and is but likelyhood "elections 2004" begin surfacing dialog of serious questioning as today is presented in turn and then by "larger and more" interest groups or organizations. This suggests so, belief that these priors lend to and can lead with only one solution which is resolutioning out a "US Multiparty System Institutionalization" campaigned and run electorally. Your annotated comments are requested and can upon request remain private as published or be made public and known! On page certain points "are just thoughts of my own" as I view matters.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely
to effect their Safety and Happiness.



Sign Guestbook

View Guestbook

United Debates Of America
C.M. R.A. Copyright 2001/10 Randy Frushour US Publisher
239 248 5870 Fridays After 4 PM
USA
Publisher@NewYork.com

Domain Lookup
         www..
Get www.yourdomainofchoice.com for your site with services!




.

 
Any WordAll WordsExact Phrase
This SiteAll Sites
Visitors: 02775
Page Updated Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:48pm EST

Home | Twenty Zeros | Individual Survey