 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
sexualabuse1
sexualabuse2
sexualabuse3
sexualabuse4
sexualabuse5
sexualabuse6
Links
Harrietts Customer List
Updates on Case
RCMP Reports
| Case Updates. |
| My present Court Situation, July 01/07 (msg 32 of 32) posted by Byron Prior from IP address 205.251.50.70 on 07/01/07 21:40:08 On June 28, I had to return to the Supreme Court after the Government Lawyer asked for another month because they were considering dropping the charges, another buy for time. This Thursday, the same result, another month, now it's July 27/07 and they tell my Government Appointed Legal Aid Lawyer, they may drop charges but the RCMP are now talking with one of my sisters and they may lay new charges. You would think after all these years and they say they spoke with my sisters, their info would be in order, would they need to tighten up their story first? No surprise for this complete cover-up and self protection mode of our corrupt system, with The History of Court System control and corruption here. In 2005, January, I was charged with Slander by Liberal MP Bill Matthews and Lawyer Steven May. I was kept in the Supreme Court all that year by Chief Justice Derek Green, Premier Danny Williams, Matthews & May, his lawyer, until November, than Justice Green, Froze my counter claim and no-one but a Lawyer could see it, only with his permission and no copies made of it. I was told they would contact me in April or May of 2006 and a complete Publication Ban on my case, I haven't heard from them since. SO, in April of 2006, I went to Ottawa, at Parliament to protest what has happened to my family, My MP Norman Doyle took all my info and delivered it by hand to Justice Minister Vic Toews, he asked New Brunswick MP Rob Moore and a Lawyer from his Dept. Andrew House to review my case and make reports. For 7 months I stayed in Ottawa every day with my info and signs at Parliament until the end of October, nothing happened. In December Andrew House called me to say the review was complete and the file was on the appropriate desk in the Federal Justice Dept. but no-one contacted me about it and the Dept changed to Rob Nickerson at that time. I decided to go to NFLD. Confederation Building in late 2006, December and early January 2007 and give out my info, I was arrested and charged with Deflamatory Liabel by the Nfld. Constabulary and kept in court until now and when they finish, now the RCMP will take over to continue to cover-up for Themselves, The Provincial Government, The Federal Government and hope they can completely destroy me and my Family, the VICTIMS, while they wait for their CRIMINAL T. ALEX HICKMAN to die as they did with our mother. GREAT CANADIAN SYSTEM, Criminals Honor and Cover-up For Their Criminals while the Victims are destroyed, and I have to sit and watch them CELEBRATE CANADA DAY. Great country for them but not for victims they leave behind while they LIE, CHEAT and STEAL their way to power. July 27/07 in Court. Today I was arreigned in Supreme Court on 3 Counts of Deflamatory Liable, I plead NOT GUILTY on all 3. The first chance I've had to say anything since January 2007, the Lawyers now say they will argue if the Law I'm charged under is Constitutional or not on Nov. 5/07. All good time taken to cover-up for their Criminal, who is one of them, and protect him and cover up the lack of action taken to prevent the abuse to me and my family by the RCMP. This, in my mind is further abuse of the Victim by the system. On Nov. 05/07 in Supreme Court the Judge decided it will take her a FEW MONTHS OR SO, to decide whether the charges aganist me are Unconstitutional or not. This decision has been made already in 3 other Canadian Provinces. This is another buy for time to cover-up for their criminal T. Alex Hickman, Retired Chief Justice, Supreme Court, would you or I get this support from the Supreme Court if we were accused of these crimes? May, 2008, Supreme Court NFLD. found Section 301 of the criminal code, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and my case was dismissed. I than decided to come home from Ottawa and do my protest at Confideration BLD. in St. John's, NL. In May of 2008 at Confideration BLD. in St. John's I was charged under section 300, Publishing false defamatory libel. I appeared in court June 10/08, then again July 23/08 and a third time February 02/09. The crown called RNC Const. Roy Normore as it's first witness and played recordings of my statements to them. My next court date is February 12/09, there will be 2 RNC witnesses and T. Alex Hickman. Feb. 17/09 is my next date and I will be my only witness. I asked to have others appear on my behalf but apparently they aren't relevant or necessary my legal aid lawyer informs me. I'm not testifing for Hickman so I don't have a free Office at Elizabeth Towers or a free Chevy. Updates again after my final court date. In court on Feb.17/09 RNC Const. Roache, the investigating officer, was the first to wittness. He said no-one from his office spoke with my sister Susanne in person ever. They asked the Peel Police to go to her address and ask her 4 questions, he said it took them less than 10 minutes in total. Talk about fishing for the answers you want to get and the economy of this investigation? In the past month Majorie Prior Anstey has had 3 different birth dates, the one I know, than the legal aid lawyer, Michele Coady, told me in her office, the crown informed her Majorie was born on December 25/67 and now Feb. 17/09, in court, the crown lawyer, Miss Reid, had birth certificates with a different date entirely. I spent approximately 1 hour on the stand in my defence. The court was adjourned until March 13/09 at 2 PM court room #6. Than i guess it will be time to KILL THE MESSANGER me. In court on March 13/09 I had my day again on the stand. My Legal Aid Lawyer, Michele Coady, said I'm the only wittness necessary in my own defence. Again I asked Judge David Orr not to believe anyone, please do a DNA test and I will pay for it, T. Alex Hickman said, under oath, the child wasn't his and he didn't have sex with my sister, there should be no reason for him not to take the test, it will tell the whole truth. For the second time Judge Orr didn't reply, so I guess the credibility of our courts will never have the complete truth. Instead, for reporting these crimes aganist my family, I have been ordered by Judge Orr to take a Psychiatric Assessment, by a Doctor he will chose and he will have Lawyer Michele Coady contact me next week with the appointment time and I'm ordered by the Judge to attend. After this assessment the final arguments will be presented in court and the Judge, David Orr, will make his decision in my case. I will make the times public here as soon as I get them. Judge Orr decided to contact Dr. D Craig, a Psychistrist at the Health Science Centre. I must report to him on April 03/09 and from than until April 08/09 he should complete his assessment of me. I spoke with friends and my family over the weekend and we decided I should get an out side the Province evaluation, so I flew to Toronto on Wednesday at 6;30 AM and met with people who arranged an appointment for me, as a first meeting with the Doctor at 2;30 PM until 5;30 PM with a Dr.Mckay, a very well qualified Doctor in Ontario. Thursday's E-mail from Dr. Mckay: This note confirms that I met with you for 3 hours yesterday. You provided a very coherent history to me. For the purposes of completing a thorough and comprehensive assessment, I confirm that I will be putting together a multidisciplinary team to coomplete the mental health assessment on you. It is my belief that this will be the best method for you as it will be comprehensive, it will be outside the small purview in which your case is being tried, and it will be thoroughly objective without either bias, or the appearance of bias. It seems, from the circumstances, and given that important and influential people are involved in this case, that there would be no way in which an assessment in your jurisdiction would be without at least the appearance of bias. It would be best if the Province of Newfoundland funded this assessment as they have requested an assessment. However, the assessment costs of the assessment are secondary to ensuring that the course of justice is both carried out fairly, without fear or favor, and that it is seen to be done so. Thursday I had further meetings with friends and flew home that night. On Monday morning I hand delivered my request for out side the Province review and I'm waiting for further instructions from Legal Aid on my request. Newfoundland and Labrador Legal Aid Commission, (delivered March 23/09 10:30 AM.) Water Street, St. John’s,NL. Attn: Mrs Michele Coady I considered the request of Judge Orr, either volunteer for a Psychiatric Assessment or he will order one with a Doctor of his choice. I decided, after consulting with my family and friends, to volunteer and have one done myself. To that end, I made an appointment in Toronto, Ontario, for Wednesday, March 18/09 at 2:30 P.M. until 5:30 P.M. 3 hours, with a Dr. Marty Mckay. I felt to have a fair and impartial evaluation and that it would appear so to everyone involved, a Doctor from another province would be fair and impartial, considering the high profile people I accuse in our province. The travel expense I have paid with help from friends and I expect the travel and the full evaluation expenses by Dr. Mckay and her team will be covered by the Dept. Of Justice, as they would be in our province. I hope this meets with everyone’s requirements and approval. Sincerely Byron Prior I had court again this morning, March 25/09 at 9:30 AM. and the Judge David Orr said he can see no reason why I should have outside the province assessment and he doesn't have the power to order one. He said if I wanted that it would be all my expense and the Doctors would have to be qualified to write a report for him. I have to take the assessment here on April 03/09 with Dr. Craig and return to court on April 08/09 at 9:30 AM. same day the report is due and he will let me know what will come next then. Dr. Marty McKay in Toronto has a team of qualified experts ready and waiting if I can manage it some how. April 03/09 I went to see the Court Appointed Psychiatrist, Dr. David Craig. I was in his office from 1:30 until 2:30 PM Friday, 1 hour and that was the first time we ever met. He has all the information he needs, we have no further appointments. I thought a psychiatric assessment would be very lengthy and involved, this Doctor must be very smart or I'm very crazy. He will send his report to the Judge, David Orr and I have to appear again on April 08/09. This doesn't look good for me folks. Byron April 08/09 Today in Court the Dr. David Craig gave his report. He says I suffer from a Delusional disorder but I'm fit to stand Trial. Judge Orr said he decided I was GUILTY on March 13/09, the day he ordered the Assesment. The recomendation is I be held at the Waterford Hospital for further treatment, drugs. The Judge asked if I want to get an Out of The Province Opinion, at my own expense, I have until April 21, 2 PM to do so. For doing what the Law says I have to do, Report a crime, now they will shut me up with a Mental Hospital and drugs. Pimozide (Orap) PLEASE, I ask my family members NOW, WHY do you protect the man who helped destroy our family, raped your sister and now put your own brother in a Mental Hospital? I cared and loved all of you the best way I could, why won't you help me now when they are about to kill me for telling the truth? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ontario Doctors Assessments from 5 Doctors. June 3, 2009 MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT Byron Prior, Date of Birth: July 29, 1953, Age at Date of Assessment - 55 Byron Prior was referred for a mental health assessment. Marty McKay, Ph.D. coordinated this assessment which included multiple clinicians conducting independent assessments of Mr. Prior’s mental status. The referral question was: Does Mr. Prior suffer from a delusional disorder or any other mental disorder? This assessment took place over the course of 2 weeks, beginning on May 14, 2009 and ending on May 27, 2009. I am a psychologist, licensed in the Province of Ontario since 1976. My practice is in Ste. Catharines, Ontario. My resume is available upon request. I carried out a 3-hour clinical interview of Byron Prior. I also administered the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the Beck Anxiety Scale and Beck Depression scale. The results of these assessment measures were analyzed. The diagnosis most consistent with the findings was that of a depressive episode. Dr. Charles Pierce, of Kitchener, Ontario, is a clinician with 35 years of professional experience. He carried out his independent component of the assessment, using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) with a computer-generated analysis and report. The MMPI is one of the most extensively used measures of mental health status and is routinely used in forensic mental health assessments. This measure did not identify signs consistent with a delusional disorder or with any other mental disorder, i.e. DSM, Axis I Disorder. Certain personality features were present which were suggestive of adjustment difficulties with respect to rules and regulations, but these do not fall within the realm of a mental disorder but as part of his personality structure and adaptational style. Marty McKay, Ph.D. administered the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III), the Davidson Trauma Scale and the Myers Briggs test of personality traits (MBTI). It is noted that the Millon is a respected psychological instrument which is frequently utilized in the forensic mental health assessments for use in court. The Millon clinical measure identified anxiety and trauma as significant issues in Mr. Prior’s functioning. As a result of the trauma score elevation, the Davidson Trauma Scale was added to the testing protocol. On this measure, past instances of emotional trauma were endorsed by Mr. Prior, but scores on the measure did not confirm sufficient criteria for a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Myers-Briggs is a measure of normal personality functioning which identifies how the individual responds to his inner and outer environment. The first measure is that of introversion-extraversion. On this measure, Mr. Prior demonstrated a slight trend toward introversion although the scores were relatively balanced between introversion-extraversion. The second dimension is that between Sensing and Intuition. His scores placed him within the Sensing category which indicates a preference for fact-based information derived from sensory information as opposed to intuition. The third dimension is that of Thinking and Feeling. His score placed him within the category of those who rely on analysis and logic rather than on feeling in assessing situations and responding to them. The dimension of Judging and Perceiving differentiates between traits such as methodical and scheduled (Judging) and traits of casual and flexible (Perceiving). Mr. Prior’s scores placed him within the Perceiving category. His overall profile then is ISTP. The ISTP personality is described in the manual as follows: “Cool onlookers—quiet, reserved, observing and analyzing life with detached curiosity and unexpected flashes of original humor. Usually interested in cause and effect, how and why mechanical things work, and in organizing facts, using logical principles. Excel at getting to the core of a practical problem and finding the solution.” Dr. Harley Wideman is a Toronto clinical psychologist who has been practicing for 50 years. He saw Mr. Prior for a clinical interview and administered projective personality testing—the Rorschach ink blots and figure drawings. He spent approximately 2 hours with him. His conclusions were that Mr. Prior does not suffer from any signs consistent with a delusional disorder, and that it was unlikely that he suffered from any other mental disorder. Specifically, Dr. Wideman stated that on the Rorschach, his perceptions were reality-based, that there was no evidence of thought disorder or perceptual distortions. The content and form were not consistent with any psychotic disorder. Dr. Andrew Barlow is a psychologist , licensed since 1979 in the Province of Ontario. He subjected Mr. Prior to a clinical interview including a structured interview designed to assess DSM criteria for Delusional Disorder. His findings were reported as not being consistent with a Delusional Disorder; no other Mental Disorder was evident in his presentation. SUMMARY The evidence independently compiled by five seasoned clinicians was based on both objective psychometric testing and clinical interviews. All were in agreement that there is no clinical evidence to support a finding of a delusional disorder as set forth in the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. All were in agreement that other than some indication of depressive tendencies there was no evidence of other mental disorders. This manual, referred to as the Psychiatric Bible, sets out the standards for assessing mental disorders. My assessment findings suggested that he could be suffering from a depressive episode, while the other tests were suggestive of past trauma issues and anxiety, all of which point to situational factors as opposed to a clinical mental disorder as explanatory in Mr. Prior’s functioning at this present time. These symptomatic findings are not consistent with a need for psychiatric hospitalization nor with the need for psychiatric medication. He could benefit from his choice of practitioner offering cognitive-behavioural counselling to deal with the situationally based stress and anxiety he is understandably experiencing at this time. It is worth noting that Mr. Prior’s circumstances, as collected during the 3-hour interview, are also not consistent with a delusional disorder. His reportedly stable marriage and ability to rear a well-functioning young adult son, would be atypical of someone suffering from a significant mental disorder, specifically a mental disorder characterized by fixed false beliefs (delusional disorder). CONCLUSIONS It is my considered professional opinion that the evidence compiled in this multi-clinician assessment is valid and reliable and does not support a diagnosis of any clinical mental disorder. It is noted that those psychological tests which have embedded validity measures (PAI, MCMI and MMPI) all indicated valid profiles. The assessment results indicate that it would be entirely inappropriate for any licensed health professional to make a recommendation for any hospitalization or psychotropic medication. The most that might be appropriately recommended would be some psychologically provided cognitive behavioural therapy, for a limited time. Thank you for the opportunity of providing this assessment. If there is a requirement for the raw data to be explained in Court and/or the report to be subjected to cross-examination, Marty McKay, Ph.D. would be the appropriate person. This recommendation is based on her position as the assessment coordinator and compiler of standardized psychological test data, enabling her to provide the expert opinion to Court. Dr. T. McL. Semple, PhD., C. Psych. 50 Lake Street, St. Catharines, ON L2R 5X1 905-984-6555 (tsemple@tmsemplepsychologist.ca) My next court date is July 20/09 at 10:00 AM Provincial Court, Atlantic Place, St. John's, NL. Doctor T. Semple will witness to their findings. Byron had court again on Monday, July 20, 2009. The Judge went with the report from Dr. Craig here in St. John's saying that Byron was delusional, rather than the report from 5 doctors from Ontario. He committed Byron to the Waterford Mental Hospital for further assessments which has to be done in 90 days. Byron will stay at the Waterford while this is being done. |
 Sign Guestbook |
 View Guestbook |
 alltrue@nl.rogers.com |
| Visitors: 02269 |