 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
INFORMATIVE LINKS
AMERICAN FLAG ETIQUETTE
DO NOT CALL LIST
GOVERNMENT
COUNCIL MEMBERSOATH OF OFFICECITY CHARTERCODIFIED ORDINANCESMASTER PLAN PART 1MASTER PLAN PART 2MASTER PLAN PART 3MASTER PLAN PART 4DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCELOVECE LETTER2003 VEHICLE LISTINGCommercial DevelopmentCYPRESS DEVELOPER AGREEMENT ICYPRESS DEVELOPER AGREEMENT 2TAX ABATEMENTHome BuildingPLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTPLANNED COMMUNIT Y DIST PG 2CITY PLANNING REPORTLETTERS TO THE EDITORPC JANUARY 12 REPORTLANDOWNERS AGREEMENTSEPT 2002 LETTER TO EDITORRECENT COUNCIL MINUTESOCTOBER 21 2003 LETTERSEPTEMBER 04 PRESS ARTICLESOCT 18 2004 COUNCIL MEETINGLawsuitQPANEL LETTERSIEMIENTKOWSKI FLYERPoliticsBUESCHER LETTERSMINNICK PCD COMMENTSMINNICK LETTERS TO THE EDITORJUNE 2004 LETTER TO THE SUNGillock 2007 Campaign FundersSalariesPOLICE SUPPORT CAR PROGRAMDECEMBER 17 COUNCIL MEETINGSchoolsJOE ANTUSH COMMENTSGovernment
COMMISSIONS AND BOARDSPoliticsOct 07 Letter to EditorHome builder
FOREST CITYpoliticsAUGUST 2004 LAW DIRECTOR LETPolitics
CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTSCampaign ContributionsHILLS CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTORSHILLS 1999 CAMPAIGN FUNDSHILL 2000 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTORN R DEMOCRATIC SOCIAL CONTRIGILLOCK CONTRIBUTIONSElection ComplaintTHE TRUTHSCHMITT ELECTION COMPLAINTPoliticsINTERESTING POSTSResidential Development
Home BuildingHAMPTON PLACEHAMPTON PLACE Page 2TELEPHONE ISSUES
Extended Area ServiceAWARDS|
|
| ||||||
| Joe Antush, STAMP member, addressed council on February 5, 2002, as follows: Ohio Schools Facilities Commission design manual requires that an elementary school be built on a minimum of 10 acres plus one acre for each 100 children. So a school for 200-400 pupils needs 12-14 acres minimum. The Waterbury PCD development is supposed to give six acres for a proposed elementary school. That is not even close to the acreage required. This donated acreage was touted as a significant amenity by those council people voting for and those supporting PCDs. I believe the council and the school board should have made it known that it was not big enough, but I guess council's greatest concern and efforts were directed to keeping the citizens from voting on PCDs. I have yet to see any real amenity or benefit to the citizens that will counter all the problems that a PCD development will cause. Even before I knew the acreage required by the state, commons sense told me that six acres wasn't enough. When the STAMP committee was negotiating with the developers in return for dropping our lawsuit and objections to the PCDs, one of the issues was that the school acreage would have to be increased. It is interesting to note that the school board is considering putting a levy on the ballot--one of the reasons for the levy is their anticipation of the big increase in pupils because of the PCD developments. It seems that they weren't that concerned about the impact when asked for their comments when PCD developments were being introduced. |
|
. |